DC Personal Injury Lawyers Go Over Oscar Pistorius Murder Trial

Free Case Evaluation

DC Personal Injury Lawyers Go Over Oscar Pistorius Murder TrialSouth African athlete Oscar Pistorius’ trial for the murder of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp took place in the High Court of South Africa in Pretoria on March 3, 2014.

Certain facts of the case were indisputable–namely that on Feb. 14, 2013, South Africa’s “Blade Runner” shot and killed his model girlfriend in the bathroom of his Pretoria home. Following the incident, the Olympian admitted he shot the model but claimed he believed that she was an intruder.

Pistorius, an Olympic and Paralympic runner famous for his prosthetic legs, was taken into custody and charged for Steenkamp’s murder and several gun-related charges, on Feb. 15, 2013.

A bail hearing took place on Feb. 19, 2013 in front of the Chief Magistrate of Pretoria, Desmond Nair. During the hearing, both prosecution and defence stated that the celebrity had fired four shots through a locked bathroom door, which hit Steenkamp three times. Prosecutor Gerrie Nel argued that the athlete had put on his prosthetic legs, walked across his bedroom to the bathroom, and intentionally shot Steenkamp through the locked door. During the hearing, Nel said that the time required to put on the prosthesis established the alleged murder as premeditated. Pistorius maintained that he had thought Steenkamp was in their bed sleeping and that the thought that the person in the bathroom was an intruder.

At the bail hearing, the chief investigating officer Hilton Botha said a witness had heard gunshots coming from Pistorius’ home and then heard a female scream, and then more shots.

At first, Botha claimed the witness was 2,000 ft away, but later the officer said the witness was 980 ft. away. Botha also said the gunshots’ trajectory indicated that shots had been fired downward, which conflicted with Pistorius’ statement that he was not wearing his prosthetics at the time. At the hearing, Botha did admit that that procedural mistakes were made during the crime scene investigation and that police had found no evidence inconsistent with the version of events presented by Pistorius.

Four days after the hearing, Botha was removed from the case after it was revealed that the officer was facing attempted murder charges from a 2009 incident.

Pistorius was formally indicted on charges of murder and the illegal possession of ammunition on Aug. 19, 2013. The indictment maintained that even if Pistorious had mistaken Steenkamp’s identity, he did intend to shoot and kill whomever he believed to be in the bathroom.

On Feb. 25, 2014, Pretoria’s High Court Judge President Dunstan Mlambo ruled in in Pretoria that the entirety of the high-profile trial could be broadcast live via audio and additionally, that portions of the trial, namely the opening and closing arguments, the testimonies of consenting state witnesses, the judgement and the sentencing, could be broadcast live via television.

On Sept. 12, 2014, Judge Thokozile Masipa delivered a verdict that Pistorius was not guilty of murder, but guilty of the culpable homicide of Steenkamp and reckless endangerment with a firearm at a restaurant. In South Africa, culpable homicide is defined as the negligent unlawful killing of another human being, similar to the English and U.S.’ term of manslaughter.

On Oct. 21, 2014, Pistorius received a prison sentence of a maximum of five years for culpable homicide and a concurrent three-year suspended prison sentence for the unrelated and separate reckless endangerment conviction. However, in Dec. 2015, South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal overturned the culpable homicide ruling and the Blade Runner’s conviction was upgraded to murder. One year later, on Jul 6, 2016, Judge Masipa sentenced Pistorius to six years in prison for murder. The state appealed for a longer prison sentence and the Supreme Court of Appeal doubled Pistorius’s six-year prison term to 13 years and five months.

Pistorius’ legal team also attempted to take the murder ruling to the constitutional court, but the court refused. His legal team and state prosecutors also battled courts over the 13-year term. However, in April 2018, The Guardian reported that South Africa’s highest court rejected Oscar Pistorius’s request to appeal against his 13-year jail term.

In April 2018, National prosecuting authority spokesman Luvuyo Mfaku told Agence France-Presse, “This is the end of the road. There are no other legal options available.”

The Steenkamp’s family lawyer Tania Koen told the publication that Reeva’s parents had “always had faith in the justice system.”

DC Personal Injury Lawyers

workers compensation attorneys in dc

Injury Attorneys DC, MD, VA – Get the Compensation You Deserve! Whether you have been injured in a car accident, a malpractice victim, injured on the job, as the result of shoddy craftsmanship, or in a slip and fall, we can help! Our experienced, competent attorneys excel in all areas of personal injury law.

Practice Areas 

FREE CASE EVALUATION

Our team is available and ready to help you with your case. Feel free to contact us via the form below or call us 24/7 at 202-955-4529

Recent Posts

Client Review

"The legal team at Cohen & Cohen did a great job I really appreciate the hard work on gating my compensation in a fair amount of time. Special thanks to Kris for a wonderful job."
Jose Rivera
Client Review

"I had a great experience with the team at Cohen & Cohen. From my intake attorney, Adam, to the paralegal, Bryan, who worked with me regularly for months to document and prepare my case, to Jill, the attorney who secured my settlement, I feel fortunate to have had their representation and expertise on my side."
Lea Harvey
Client Review

Read more:

Hear from our clients

If you have been injured, contact Cohen & Cohen for a free case evaluation today. Our staff is available 24/7 to assist you.

Cohen & Cohen has an  impeccable Client Satisfaction Rating with hundreds of
5 STAR Reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in the areas we serve.

Cohen & Cohen has an  impeccable Client Satisfaction Rating with hundreds of
5 STAR Reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in the areas we serve.

Towhanna Boston
Towhanna Boston
2024-07-09
This was an awesome experience with Brittney Cassiere, Miriam Calisher, and my attorney Jill. What made me select Cohen & Cohen for my case, was my experience many years ago with Kim Brooks-Rodney. I definitely recommend anyone to use them. They have your best interest at hand.
Christopher Daly
Christopher Daly
2024-06-18
Adam Leighton did a great job handling my case so did Miriam and i was very satisfied with the outcome of the case! would recommend to anyone looking for a lawyer on a dog bite case.
Tenki Si
Tenki Si
2024-06-18
The attention to detail from every member of the team is impressive. The Cohen&Cohen provides very practical and efficient solutions to tough problems. They are highly responsive and they show true caring and compassion for their clients. Cohen&Cohen is the best Firm in Dmv
Michael Bulong
Michael Bulong
2024-06-17
I am very satisfied with the services provided by Cohen and Cohen. They were able to settle my case within less than a year and settled a fair amount in which I was expecting. They communicated very well throughout the process as well as made sure all boxes were checked off to ensure i received the best care and communication. I will recommend the services to anyone in these situations. Riley and Brittney were certainly very helpful during the process.
Diana Jimenez
Diana Jimenez
2024-06-15
Great experience with Miriam and the team at Cohen and Cohen! They were welcoming, set realistic expectations, communicated clearly and consistently and answered all my questions. Thank you!
Brody Sorrell
Brody Sorrell
2024-06-12
So glad I picked them! They crushed it and exceeded my expectation. They kept me in the loop frequently and whenever called or emailed. I would highly recommend them.
Miyagi Wassabi
Miyagi Wassabi
2024-06-05
Riley is the best she is very good at communicating with the customer and also she got me what I wanted
Suzanne McQuaid
Suzanne McQuaid
2024-05-22
Lucas Baudry was my rep for this accident claim, and even though I had LOADS of questions and was a bit impatient, he was always responsive and quick to reply. We’re wrapping up now, and I really feel like he tried to have the best results in the end, and didn’t drag it out more than need be.
Darlene Blake
Darlene Blake
2024-05-20
I had a great experience with this company. Mr. Baudry worked diligently with my case, he was very professional and straight to the point. He gathered all the information that he needed to get the job done. I recommend this company to all the people that I come across that need help. Thanks a lot. Darlene Dixon-Blake