Skip to main content

Judge’s Ruling Against Border Wall Lawsuit Challenged

June 12, 2019


30+ Years | 10,000+ Cases | $300 Million+ Recovered

Appearing On:

Posted in Personal Injury Lawyer

Judge’s Ruling Against Border Wall Lawsuit ChallengedThe Democratic-controlled House of Representatives are appealing a federal judge’s ruling to not block President Donald Trump from financing a border wall.

Judge Trevor McFadden determined earlier this month that the House didn’t have enough standing to bring the challenge and that the court shouldn’t interfere between the fight between the House and the President.

“The Court declines to take sides in this fight between the House and the President,” McFadden wrote.
“This case presents a close question about the appropriate role of the Judiciary in resolving disputes between the other two branches of the Federal Government. To be clear, the court does not imply that Congress may never sue the Executive to protect its powers,” he added.

McFadden also wrote that lawmakers have more options to fight the President’s decision than the court system. “Congress has several political arrows in its quiver to counter perceived threats to its sphere of power,” he wrote. “These tools show that this lawsuit is not a last resort for the House. And this fact is also exemplified by the many other cases across the country challenging the administration’s planned construction of the border wall.”
The House, along with several other organizations, filed a lawsuit against the President’s national emergency declaration. More than 100 former House members signed a brief that stated, “Rarely in our Nation’s history has the Executive Branch launched such an assault on Congress’s exclusive legislative powers. Without action by this Court to prevent the Administration’s usurpation of congressional authority, the unchecked expansion of the Executive’s power at the expense of the Legislative Branch will threaten our democracy,” the brief said.

The lawsuit claims that Trump’s decision to move funds for the wall went against the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress power over the designation of federal spending. The House asked McFadden to stop the spending of money transferred for the wall.

Why Accident Survivors Trust Cohen & Cohen

Hear From Our Clients

“Cohen & Cohen did a great job at recovering a good amount of money for me after my accident. Siri was super informative & responsive. Overall I had a great experience using this firm & they will be my first call if I am ever in an accident again.”

– Charles M.

John Guy - Personal Injury Client Personal Injury Accident

“I had a very positive experience with Cohen & Cohen and I highly recommend them to anyone who needs their services.”

– John G.

Tractor Trailer vs Car

“I would highly recommend Cohen & Cohen. They were awesome on my case. Cohen & Cohen had my best interest at heart at all times.”

– Morgan L.

maria m personal injury accident Maryland Personal Injury Accident

“My experience at Cohen & Cohen has been great from the beginning until the very end when my case was closed…I would definitely recommend them to family, friends or anyone that has a case with a personal injury accident.”

– Maria M.

Reviews

From Our Valued Clients

Cohen & Cohen has an impeccable client satisfaction rating with hundreds of 5-star reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in D.C., Virginia, and Maryland.

Best Personal Injury Lawyer in DC

Cohen & Cohen Has Been Featured On

Cohen & Cohen

Free Case Evaluation

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.