Ordinary vs. Gross Negligence in DC Personal Injury Cases

Free Case Evaluation

Ordinary vs. Gross Negligence Lawyer Washington DC

In the legal world, negligence is an important concept. To be negligent in the eyes of the law means that you have breached your legal duty, and it has harmed another. 

In this post, we’ll be going over two commonly misunderstood types of negligence: ordinary, and gross.

Ordinary negligence is a careless mistake. It’s not paying attention. For example, let’s say a cook doesn’t cook a piece of meat all the way through, and the customer becomes sick from it. The cook did not mean to cause harm to the other person. However, under the eyes of the law, he can still be held legally responsible. That’s ordinary negligence.

Gross negligence, sometimes known as culpable negligence, is much more severe. It is the reckless disregard for the safety of others. It is something that will likely cause serious harm, and that should reasonably have been foreseen. One of the more famous gross negligence cases occurred in Florida. It was a medical malpractice case – Allan Navarro v. Michael P. Austin. Mr. Navarro wentOrdinary vs. Gross Negligence Lawyer Washington DC to the emergency room complaining of nausea, headaches, and dizziness. The doctors were told that the family had a history of strokes. He was diagnosed with sinusitis and prescribed painkillers. The next day, he returned to the hospital with more severe symptoms, and spent the following three months in a coma. Mr. Navarro had suffered a stroke, and is now permanently disabled. The settlement was for $217 million.

There are four items to check off to establish negligence. They are (1) duty (2) breach (3) causation and (4) harm. “Duty to care” is a term that, according to Alllaw.com, refers to the responsibility that one person has to avoid causing harm to another. A doctor has a duty to care – safely and thoroughly – for his or her patient. In the case above, the doctor had a duty to accurately prescribe medicine. By accidentally prescribing a medicine that you are allergic to, there was a breach of duty. The harm was the severe allergic reaction. Now, to prove negligence, it has to be shown that the medicine was what caused the severe allergic reaction. 

Damages (monetary compensation collected from the other party) in a case can vary. They depend on a variety of factors, including the nature of the injury, property damage, and more.

If you have suffered an injury that you believe was the result of negligence, contact the experienced attorneys at Cohen & Cohen for a free case evaluation!

workers compensation attorneys in dc

Injury Attorneys DC, MD, VA – Get the Compensation You Deserve! Whether you have been injured in a car accident, a malpractice victim, injured on the job, as the result of shoddy craftsmanship, or in a slip and fall, we can help! Our experienced, competent attorneys excel in all areas of personal injury law.

Practice Areas 

FREE CASE EVALUATION

Our team is available and ready to help you with your case. Feel free to contact us via the form below or call us 24/7 at 202-955-4529

Recent Posts

Client Review

"The legal team at Cohen & Cohen did a great job I really appreciate the hard work on gating my compensation in a fair amount of time. Special thanks to Kris for a wonderful job."
Jose Rivera
Client Review

"I had a great experience with the team at Cohen & Cohen. From my intake attorney, Adam, to the paralegal, Bryan, who worked with me regularly for months to document and prepare my case, to Jill, the attorney who secured my settlement, I feel fortunate to have had their representation and expertise on my side."
Lea Harvey
Client Review

Read more:

Cohen & Cohen has an  impeccable Client Satisfaction Rating with hundreds of
5 STAR Reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in the areas we serve.

Cohen & Cohen has an  impeccable Client Satisfaction Rating with hundreds of
5 STAR Reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in the areas we serve.