Skip to main content

DC Dog Bite Lawyer


30+ Years | 10,000+ Cases | $300 Million+ Recovered

team

Appearing On:

Were you injured in a dog bite incident in Washington, DC?

At Cohen & Cohen, we are dog bite lawyers who pursue full recovery for injured clients and their families.

If a dog attacked you or your child, an attorney can pursue compensation from the owner and from any insurance policy that responds to the claim. Our firm has recovered more than $300 million across over 10,000 cases since 1993. A Washington, DC dog bite lawyer at our firm will establish how the attack occurred, determine which theory of liability applies, and handle the homeowner’s or renter’s carrier on your behalf. Contact our office to arrange a free review of your case.

Dog Bite Lawyer Washington, DC

Liability for a dog attack in the District rests on negligence rather than on automatic responsibility. Under the common-law rule, an owner is liable where the animal had previously shown vicious propensities and the owner knew or should have known of them. The District modifies that rule in one significant respect. Section 8-1808 of the D.C. Code prohibits an owner from allowing a dog to go at large, and Section 8-1812 provides that where a dog injures a person while at large, the owner’s lack of knowledge of the animal’s vicious propensity will not by itself absolve the owner from a finding of negligence.

That distinction decides many of these claims. Whether the dog was leashed, confined, and under control at the moment of the attack is frequently the first question an attorney asks.

Types of Dog Bite Cases We Handle in Washington, DC

Attacks happen in a limited number of settings, and the location matters because it determines which theory of liability applies and which insurance policy responds. Our attorneys handle the following matters across the District.

  • Attacks by dogs at large. Bites occurring when an animal was off its owner’s property, unleashed, and not under the control of anyone able to restrain it. These claims proceed under the District’s at-large provisions.
  • Bites on private property. Attacks on visitors, guests, and invitees, which frequently overlap with premises liability principles concerning the condition of the property and what the occupant knew.
  • Child injuries. Children are bitten more often than any other group and sustain facial and head injuries at disproportionate rates because of their height relative to a dog.
  • Delivery and service worker attacks. Postal carriers, package couriers, utility workers, and meter readers bitten while performing work on residential property.
  • Landlord and property manager liability. Claims against a party other than the owner where that party knew a dangerous animal was kept on the premises and retained authority to act.
  • Attacks by dogs in rental units and common areas. Incidents in apartment buildings, shared hallways, courtyards, and other areas under building control.
  • Infection and secondary complications. Puncture wounds that lead to serious infection, tendon and nerve damage, or extended hospitalization well after the initial treatment.
  • Scarring and disfigurement. Injuries requiring reconstructive or plastic surgery, which carry both medical costs and lasting non-economic harm.
  • Catastrophic injuries. Multiple-dog attacks and maulings producing permanent impairment, including nerve damage and loss of function.
  • Wrongful death. Claims brought by families in the rare cases where an attack proves fatal.

Why Choose Cohen & Cohen as my Dog Bite Lawyer in Washington, DC?

Attorneys Who Establish Liability Where It Is Contested

Adam R. Leighton is an AV-rated attorney who graduated from the University of Toledo School of Law in 1997 and served as President of the Trial Lawyers Association of Washington, D.C. from 2011 to 2012. He has been named a Super Lawyer in the District every year since 2011 and appears in the 23rd Edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Kim Brooks-Rodney has practiced in the District since 1986 and handles serious injury claims, having previously worked on the liability and claims side before moving to plaintiff’s representation. Because a dog bite claim in the District can succeed or fail on what the owner knew and where the animal was, the work of a personal injury lawyer in Washington, DC begins with reconstructing both.

Results and Fee Structure

Our firm has recovered in excess of $300 million over more than 10,000 cases. Wayne R. Cohen holds the AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell, and firm attorneys have been recognized by The National Trial Lawyers and are sought regularly by national media for commentary on injury and liability matters. Dog bite claims are handled on contingency. There is no retainer, no hourly billing, and no attorney’s fee unless we obtain a recovery for you.

What Is Important to Understand About a Dog Bite Case?

Damages, Liability, and Compensation for Dog Bite Cases

The financial consequences of a serious bite extend well past the emergency room visit. Infection, nerve damage, and scar revision surgery often unfold over months. Recovery in a District dog bite claim can include:

  • Medical expenses. Emergency treatment, wound care, antibiotics, rabies prophylaxis where indicated, and surgical repair.
  • Reconstructive and plastic surgery. Scar revision procedures, which are frequently staged across several years, particularly for children.
  • Lost income. Wages missed during treatment and recovery.
  • Pain and suffering. Physical pain and the psychological consequences of an attack, which commonly include lasting fear of dogs.
  • Permanent disfigurement. Visible scarring, which is compensable separately from the cost of treating it.

The District applies contributory negligence, and a person found to share any degree of fault in causing the attack may recover nothing. Defenses in these cases are built around provocation, trespass, and whether the injured person acted in a way that prompted the animal. Those arguments are raised routinely, including against children, which makes a careful account of the incident important from the outset.

What Are Important Aspects of a Dog Bite Case?

A small number of facts determine how one of these claims proceeds.

  • Whether the dog was leashed, confined, or otherwise restrained at the time of the attack
  • Whether the incident occurred on the owner’s property, on public property, or on land controlled by someone else
  • Any history of prior bites, complaints, or aggressive behavior known to the owner
  • Identification of the owner and of any homeowner’s, renter’s, or umbrella policy that may respond
  • Medical documentation connecting the wound, any infection, and the resulting scarring to the attack

What Is The Dog Bite Case Timeline?

These claims often resolve faster than other injury matters because liability is either established early or contested from the start. Scarring cases are the exception, since the permanence of a scar cannot be assessed until it has matured.

  1. Reporting the attack and obtaining the animal bite report
  2. Identification of the owner, the animal, and the applicable insurance coverage
  3. Medical treatment, including any staged surgical repair
  4. Assessment of permanent scarring once healing is complete
  5. Demand and negotiation with the homeowner’s or renter’s carrier
  6. Suit in the Civil Actions Branch if the claim does not resolve, followed by discovery and trial where necessary

What Should You Bring to Your Dog Bite Consultation?

Bringing documentation to the first meeting allows us to assess the claim more accurately, though none of it is required and we can obtain most records on your behalf.

  • Photographs of the injuries, taken as soon after the attack as possible and again during healing
  • The animal bite report or any police or animal control report
  • Medical records, discharge instructions, and bills
  • The owner’s name and address, along with any insurance information provided
  • Contact details for anyone who saw the attack

We will explain which theory of liability appears to apply to your facts and give you a direct assessment of the claim.

Reach Out to Cohen & Cohen to Schedule a Consultation

Case reviews are provided at no cost, and our attorneys work on contingency, so no fee is owed unless we recover on your behalf. During the consultation we will review how the attack occurred, identify the coverage available, and explain what the District’s rules require you to establish. Contact us to arrange a time. New inquiries receive a response within 24 to 48 hours.

Dog Bite Statistics in Washington, DC

Dog bites are among the most common injuries that never reach a lawyer’s office, because the overwhelming majority require no medical treatment at all. The subset that does is substantial, and the injury pattern within it is consistent across decades of federal data.

Age is the strongest predictor of who gets hurt. Children are bitten at higher rates than adults, and because a child’s head is at the height of a standing dog, their injuries concentrate on the face, scalp, and neck. That anatomy is also why pediatric bite cases so often involve reconstructive surgery rather than simple wound closure.

  • The CDC analyzed national emergency department surveillance data and estimated that 368,245 people were treated in U.S. emergency departments for nonfatal dog bite injuries in 2001.
  • Injury rates in that analysis were highest among children aged 5 to 9 years.
  • The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reported that approximately 4.5 million people in the United States are bitten by dogs each year, with most bites requiring no medical attention.
  • The same agency examined emergency department visits and inpatient stays involving dog bites for 2008, the first such national estimate since the mid-1990s.
  • The surveillance system underlying the CDC estimate draws on a nationally representative sample of hospitals with a minimum of six beds and a 24-hour emergency department.

Types of Evidence Used in Dog Bite Cases

Because liability in the District turns on what the owner knew and where the animal was, these claims are built from a narrower evidence set than most injury cases.

  1. Photographs of the injuries over time. Images taken at the emergency room, during healing, and after the scar has matured. A scar photographed only once, at its worst or at its best, understates or overstates the permanent harm.
  2. The animal bite report. Attacks are reportable in the District, and the resulting record identifies the animal, the owner, and the circumstances. It also establishes vaccination status, which bears on whether rabies treatment was necessary.
  3. Prior complaint history. Records of earlier bites, neighbor complaints, or prior calls about the same animal. This evidence goes directly to what the owner knew, which is the central element under the common-law rule.
  4. Proof of the dog’s location and restraint. Whether the animal was leashed, fenced, or loose at the moment of the attack, established through witness accounts, photographs of the property, and video.
  5. Video footage. Doorbell cameras, building security systems, and nearby business cameras. Residential systems frequently overwrite within days, which is why these requests cannot wait.
  6. Witness statements. Accounts from neighbors, other pedestrians, or building staff, particularly where the owner disputes that the animal was loose or claims the injured person provoked it.
  7. Medical records and treatment notes. Documentation of the wound, any infection that developed, nerve or tendon involvement, and the course of surgical repair.
  8. Ownership and tenancy records. Deeds, leases, and property management files establishing who owned the animal and who controlled the premises where the attack occurred.
  9. Insurance policy documents. Homeowner’s, renter’s, and umbrella policies, including any breed exclusions or animal liability limits that affect available coverage.
  10. Treating physician opinions on permanence. Assessments of whether scarring is permanent and whether further revision surgery is indicated, which shape the value of the claim more than any other single factor.

Washington, DC Dog Bite Lawyer FAQs

Is Washington, DC a strict liability state for dog bites?

The District is not a strict liability jurisdiction, despite frequent claims to the contrary. It applies the common-law rule under which an owner is liable where the animal had shown vicious propensities and the owner knew or should have known. Sections 8-1808 and 8-1812 of the D.C. Code modify that rule for dogs at large, providing that lack of knowledge alone will not absolve an owner from a finding of negligence in those circumstances.

Who pays for a dog bite injury?

Usually the owner’s homeowner’s or renter’s insurance policy. Animal liability coverage is standard in most policies, though some exclude certain breeds or cap animal-related claims. Where the owner is uninsured, a landlord or property manager may bear responsibility if they knew a dangerous animal was kept on the premises.

What if a dog bit my child?

Children are the most frequently bitten group and sustain facial injuries at higher rates than adults. Claims on behalf of a minor follow different filing deadlines and require court approval of any settlement. Valuing a child’s scarring is also more complex, since revision surgery may continue for years as the child grows.

Do I have to report the bite?

Animal bites are reportable in the District, and reporting creates the record that identifies the animal and its vaccination status. That record is frequently the starting point for the claim. Reporting also triggers the process by which authorities determine whether the animal poses an ongoing danger.

What if the dog had never bitten anyone before?

It may still be possible to recover. If the animal was at large when the attack occurred, the owner’s lack of knowledge of any vicious propensity does not by itself defeat a finding of negligence. Where the dog was properly restrained on the owner’s property, establishing prior knowledge becomes considerably more important.

How long do I have to file a dog bite claim in DC?

Most District personal injury claims must be filed within three years of the date of injury under D.C. Code § 12-301(8). Claims brought on behalf of a minor follow different timing. Because missing a deadline ends the claim permanently, confirm the applicable period with an attorney rather than assuming three years applies.

How much does a dog bite lawyer cost?

There is no cost to begin. Our firm works on contingency, so the fee is a percentage of any recovery and no attorney’s fee is owed if we do not obtain one. The terms are provided in writing before we start work, and the consultation itself is free and carries no obligation.

What if I was bitten by a friend’s or family member’s dog?

This concern keeps many people from pursuing a valid claim. The claim is made against an insurance policy rather than against the person, and that policy exists precisely for this situation. The owner typically pays nothing out of pocket beyond any deductible.

How much is a dog bite case worth?

Value depends on the severity of the wound, whether infection or nerve damage developed, the cost of surgical repair, the permanence and visibility of scarring, income lost, and the coverage available. Claim values vary widely, and facial scarring in particular changes the analysis substantially.

Can the owner argue I provoked the dog?

Provocation is among the most common defenses raised in these cases. Provocation, trespass, and assumption of risk are the standard defenses, and because the District applies contributory negligence, a successful provocation argument can defeat the claim entirely rather than merely reduce it. This is the principal reason to avoid discussing the incident with the owner’s carrier.

Important Resources for Washington, DC Dog Bite Cases

What Are Important District of Columbia Legal Resources for Dog Bite Cases?

The sources below allow you to review the District’s rules directly. They are research starting points rather than substitutes for advice on your own case.

  • The D.C. Law Library publishes Section 8-1808, which addresses an owner’s obligation not to allow a dog to go at large.
  • The same library publishes Section 8-1812, which concerns an owner’s negligence where a dog injures a person while at large.
  • Limitations periods governing when an injury claim must be filed appear at Section 12-301.
  • The D.C. Courts website explains civil procedure and provides forms for litigants.
  • Damages recoverable in a negligence action are addressed in the District’s civil jury instructions, which our firm summarizes.

What Are Important Local Resources for Washington, DC Dog Bite Cases?

The organizations below assist District residents following an animal attack. Cohen & Cohen has no affiliation with, and does not endorse or sponsor, any organization listed here. This information is provided solely for convenience.

  • Humane Rescue Alliance – (202) 576-6664. Animal control services for the District, including bite investigation and animal impoundment.
  • DC Health – (202) 442-5955. Animal bite reporting and rabies control for the District.
  • Metropolitan Police Department – (202) 727-9099. Incident reports where an attack involved police response.
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center – (202) 877-7000. Regional trauma center serving the District.
  • Children’s National Hospital – (202) 476-5000. Pediatric emergency and reconstructive care.

About Cohen & Cohen

Founder Wayne R. Cohen opened the firm in 1993, two years after beginning his own practice, and it has represented injured people across Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia ever since. He has been named a Super Lawyer in the District in every year from 2011 through 2025 and was identified by Washingtonian Magazine among Washington’s top lawyers. Over the life of the firm, our attorneys have handled more than 10,000 matters and recovered over $300 million for clients, including a $1,333,671 result in a case involving a failure to treat a fracture. The firm’s lawyers maintain admissions across the District, Maryland, and Virginia.

What Our Clients Say

★★★★★

“We’re so glad that we found Cohen & Cohen after my daughter’s injury in January 2023. Kim Brooks-Rodney did a wonderful job for us–she offered clear explanations at every step in the process, answered all of our questions, and settled our case in a way we are extremely happy with. We hope to never again need a personal injury lawyer, but if we do–Ms. Brooks-Rodney will be the lawyer we ask to represent us.” – Amy Holdcroft

Read more reviews on our Google Business Profile.

Additional Resources for Washington, DC Dog Bite Cases

Contact Cohen & Cohen

An attack by someone else’s animal carries medical costs and permanent consequences that the person bitten did not choose. Our attorneys have represented injured people throughout the District for more than three decades, and dog bite claims are handled on contingency, so no attorney’s fee is owed unless we obtain a recovery. The consultation is free and obligates you to nothing. We will review how the attack occurred, explain which theory of liability applies under District law, and identify the insurance coverage available to you. Our office responds to new inquiries within 24 to 48 hours.

Personal Injury Attorneys In:

Washington DC | Maryland | Virginia


Why Accident Survivors Trust Cohen & Cohen

Hear From Our Clients

“Cohen & Cohen did a great job at recovering a good amount of money for me after my accident. Siri was super informative & responsive. Overall I had a great experience using this firm & they will be my first call if I am ever in an accident again.”

– Charles M.

John Guy - Personal Injury Client Personal Injury Accident

“I had a very positive experience with Cohen & Cohen and I highly recommend them to anyone who needs their services.”

– John G.

Tractor Trailer vs Car

“I would highly recommend Cohen & Cohen. They were awesome on my case. Cohen & Cohen had my best interest at heart at all times.”

– Morgan L.

maria m personal injury accident Maryland Personal Injury Accident

“My experience at Cohen & Cohen has been great from the beginning until the very end when my case was closed…I would definitely recommend them to family, friends or anyone that has a case with a personal injury accident.”

– Maria M.

Reviews

From Our Valued Clients

Cohen & Cohen has an impeccable client satisfaction rating with hundreds of 5-star reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in D.C., Virginia, and Maryland.

Posted on Google Google
Towhanna Boston profile picture
Towhanna Boston
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This was an awesome experience with Brittney Cassiere, Miriam Calisher, and my attorney Jill. What made me select Cohen & Cohen for my case, was my experience many years ago with Kim Brooks-Rodney. I definitely recommend anyone to use them. They have your best interest at hand.
Posted on Google Google
Christopher Daly profile picture
Christopher Daly
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Adam Leighton did a great job handling my case so did Miriam and i was very satisfied with the outcome of the case! would recommend to anyone looking for a lawyer on a dog bite case.
Posted on Google Google
Tenki Si profile picture
Tenki Si
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The attention to detail from every member of the team is impressive. The Cohen & Cohen provides very practical and efficient solutions to tough problems. They are highly responsive and they show true caring and compassion for their clients. Cohen & Cohen is the best Firm in Dmv
Posted on Google Google
Michael Bulong profile picture
Michael Bulong
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I am very satisfied with the services provided by Cohen and Cohen. They were able to settle my case within less than a year and settled a fair amount in which I was expecting. They communicated very well throughout the process as well as made sure all boxes were checked off to ensure i received the best care and communication. I will recommend the services to anyone in these situations. Riley and Brittney were certainly very helpful during the process.
Posted on Google Google
Diana Jimenez profile picture
Diana Jimenez
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great experience with Miriam and the team at Cohen and Cohen! They were welcoming, set realistic expectations, communicated clearly and consistently and answered all my questions. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Brody Sorrell profile picture
Brody Sorrell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
So glad I picked them! They crushed it and exceeded my expectation. They kept me in the loop frequently and whenever called or emailed. I would highly recommend them.
Posted on Google Google
Miyagi Wassabi profile picture
Miyagi Wassabi
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Riley is the best she is very good at communicating with the customer and also she got me what I wanted
Posted on Google Google
Suzanne McQuaid profile picture
Suzanne McQuaid
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Lucas Baudry was my rep for this accident claim, and even though I had LOADS of questions and was a bit impatient, he was always responsive and quick to reply. We’re wrapping up now, and I really feel like he tried to have the best results in the end, and didn’t drag it out more than need be.
Posted on Google Google
Darlene Blake profile picture
Darlene Blake
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience with this company. Mr. Baudry worked diligently with my case, he was very professional and straight to the point. He gathered all the information that he needed to get the job done. I recommend this company to all the people that I come across that need help. Thanks a lot. Darlene Dixon-Blake

Best Personal Injury Lawyer in DC

Cohen & Cohen Has Been Featured On

Cohen & Cohen

Free Case Evaluation