D.C. Human Rights Act Jury Instructions Part I D.C. Car Accident Lawyer

Free Case Evaluation

District of Columbia Human Rights Act Jury Instructions 24.01 – 24.04

The Washington D.C. Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination in housing, employment, public accommodations, and educational institutions. The act is based on 21 protected traits: race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, family responsibilities, political affiliation, and disability. Depending on the situation, these traits apply: matriculation, familial status, genetic information, source of income, place of residence, status as a victim of an intrafamily offense, credit information, and status as a victim or family member of a victim of domestic violence, sexual offense, or stalking.

In this post, we will cover Section 24.01 – 24.04 of the proposed jury instructions for cases alleging human rights violations.

jury instructions dc human rights act dc auto accident lawyerSection 24.02 informs the jury that adverse employment actions may not be made on account of one’s race, color, sex, etc. More specifically, based on an individual having a certain trait, an employer “may not fail or refuse to hire, or to discharge, or to not promote, or segregate or classify employees in some way that deprive employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee.” Similar rules apply to employment agencies and to labor organizations.

The instructions move forward by establishing the ways in which a judge evaluates DCHRA cases. There is a three-part formula used by courts. Knight v. Georgetown, 725 A.2d 472, 478 (1999). 

Part I

The plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of unlawful discrimination. To do this, the plaintiff must show that he belongs to a protected class, is qualified for the position, that he was the subject of an adverse employment decision, and that race played a substantial role.

Part II

The employer must rebut the presumption “by articulating some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the employment action at issue.” Id. 

Part III

The employee must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the reason for the adverse personnel action is due to his or her race, color, etc.

Later, however, in Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, the rule was revised; the ruling opined that it does not matter whether the plaintiff made out a prima facie case, and that the court only must resolve one question: “Has the employee produced sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that the employer’s asserted non-discriminatory reason was not the actual reason and that the employer intentionally discriminated against the employee on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin?” Id.

The final section we will cover today is about language use. The instructions note that legalese confuses the jury. The jury serves as fact finder, so it “need not be told about concepts that guide the judge in determining whether the case merits jury consideration.” Cabrera v. Jakabovitz, 24 F.3d 372, 380 (2d Cir. 1994). 

If you’ve been the victim of negligence or wrongful conduct, the attorneys at Cohen & Cohen can help you get the compensation you deserve. Contact us today at (202) 955-4529 for a free case evaluation. 

 

workers compensation attorneys in dc
[divi_library_shortcode id="987499082"]

Injury Attorneys DC, MD, VA – Get the Compensation You Deserve! Whether you have been injured in a car accident, a malpractice victim, injured on the job, as the result of shoddy craftsmanship, or in a slip and fall, we can help! Our experienced, competent attorneys excel in all areas of personal injury law.

Practice Areas 

FREE CASE EVALUATION

Our team is available and ready to help you with your case. Feel free to contact us via the form below or call us 24/7 at 202-955-4529

Recent Posts

Client Review

"The legal team at Cohen & Cohen did a great job I really appreciate the hard work on gating my compensation in a fair amount of time. Special thanks to Kris for a wonderful job."
Jose Rivera
Client Review

"I had a great experience with the team at Cohen & Cohen. From my intake attorney, Adam, to the paralegal, Bryan, who worked with me regularly for months to document and prepare my case, to Jill, the attorney who secured my settlement, I feel fortunate to have had their representation and expertise on my side."
Lea Harvey
Client Review

Read more:

Hear from our clients

If you have been injured, contact Cohen & Cohen for a free case evaluation today. Our staff is available 24/7 to assist you.

Cohen & Cohen has an  impeccable Client Satisfaction Rating with hundreds of
5 STAR Reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in the areas we serve.

Cohen & Cohen has an  impeccable Client Satisfaction Rating with hundreds of
5 STAR Reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in the areas we serve.

L Proctor
August 30, 2022.
My experience with Cohen &Cohen was beyond my expectations. Jill did an amazing job with negotiating on my behalf and got me way more money than I anticipated. Thank you for having my back.
Ebony Stoutmiles
June 23, 2022.
To say that I am happy with the outcome of my case is the understatement of the century! Jill Stanley is a BEAST at what she does. That is the only way to explain it. She takes no prisoners. She and her team are very skilled and knowledgeable. I am so happy I trusted them to do their job and rolled with Jill's suggestions. I would choose Jill again 100 times. She settled my case for more than I imagined I would receive. I was literally in tears. It is the best feeling to know my pain isn't for naught. Wayne Cohen and Kristopher Yorke were nothing short of amazing. They have the patience of saints. I'm 100% certain that I got on their last nerves with my frustration and tears at every other call I had with them. Being in pain and wanting to just be able to heal was all I could focus on, but they helped me realize that I also had to focus on the bigger picture (the case) so I could put this piece behind me. As a high-strung individual with anxiety, it was hard for me to not worry and let them do their jobs, but they reassured me all of the time that they had this. To be injured before the start of the pandemic and have to receive regular, weekly treatment while others are able to stay home is anxiety inducing. I was in pain, I was anxious, and I was just hoping it all worked out. It more than worked out. I hope Jill, Siri, and Kris know how much their hard work and "hanging in there" meant to me. I am eternally grateful. I can't recommend you all enough. If you choose this law firm, you won't be sorry!
Beloved Temple
June 3, 2022.
I was very pleased with the handling of my case and settlement with Cohen& Cohen. I appreciate them, would highly recommend them.
willie howell
May 25, 2022.
COHEN & COHEN ARE THE BEST I WAS INVOLVED IN A REAR END CAR CRASH AND 2 YEARS LATER I HAVE RECEIVED MY SETTLEMENT I AM VERY EXCITED TO SAY BRYAN!!! IS THE MAN HE INSURED THEY WILL TAKE CARE OF ME AND THEY DID 100% ANY QUESTIONS I ASKED THEY WERE ANSWERED. Jill and SIRI WAS ALSO REMARKABLE AND SHOWED THEY REALLY CARED I RECOMMEND COHEN &COHEN TO ANYONE THEY ALSO MADE SURE I GOT MORE THAN EXPECTED WHICH WAS AMAZING I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS THANK U💯
Jose Rivera
May 25, 2022.
The legal team at cohen & cohen did a great job I really appreciate the hard work on gating my compensation in a fair amount of time. Special thanks to Kris for a wonderful job
Lea Harvey
May 25, 2022.
I had a great experience with the team at Cohen & Cohen. From my intake attorney, Adam, to the paralegal, Bryan, who worked with me regularly for months to document and prepare my case, to Jill, the attorney who secured my settlement, I feel fortunate to have had their representation and expertise on my side.
Cameron Galloway (HustleDaGod)
May 19, 2022.
Kris was phenomenal. Spectacular communication & knowledge in regards to my case. Would definitely return if I needed more legal services. 100% definitely recommend.