Skip to main content

Dealing With Insurance Companies After an Accident


30+ Years | 10,000+ Cases | $300 Million+ Recovered

team

Appearing On:

An adjuster is not your adversary in any personal sense, and treating the relationship as hostile helps no one. An adjuster is an employee whose job is to resolve claims for the least amount the file supports. That is the position they occupy, and understanding it is more useful than assuming bad faith.

Two Insurers, Two Different Obligations

Your own policy contains a cooperation clause. It obligates you to report the loss and to answer reasonable questions from your own carrier, and failing to do so can jeopardize your own coverage.

You owe the other driver’s insurer nothing comparable. No statute requires you to give a recorded statement to a company that insures the person who injured you, and no rule requires you to sign the medical authorization they send. The two situations are frequently conflated, and the other carrier rarely corrects the confusion. The safest posture is to confirm the basic facts and decline the rest, since talking with an insurance company is a conversation the adjuster has had thousands of times and the claimant has had once.

What Gets Requested and Why

The recorded statement. Questions are open-ended and appear conversational. Whether you saw the other car before impact, how fast you estimate you were traveling, and whether you feel any better today are all standard. In a jurisdiction where any share of claimant fault defeats a claim entirely, an estimate offered from memory becomes a fact in the file.

The blanket medical authorization. These are often written broadly enough to reach your entire treatment history rather than the records connected to this incident. A history of back complaints from six years ago becomes the causation defense. Providing records limited to the relevant period, through your own request rather than theirs, produces the same information without the excess.

The early offer. An offer arriving before treatment concludes is not a valuation. It is an attempt to close the file before the medical picture is known, and accepting it ends the claim regardless of what develops afterward. Most injury settlements in the District are reached only after treatment ends and the complete record is submitted, which is why an early number rarely resembles the final one.

What the District Requires of Insurers

Claim handling is regulated. Under D.C. Code § 31-2231.17, it is an unfair claim settlement practice to refuse to pay a claim without conducting a reasonable investigation, to fail to affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable time after proof of loss is complete, to fail to act with reasonable promptness on claim communications, or to fail to attempt in good faith to reach a prompt and equitable settlement where liability has become reasonably clear.

Two limits matter. The statute reaches conduct performed in conscious disregard of the policy or with enough frequency to indicate a general business practice, so a single slow response is not a violation. And it is enforced administratively rather than through a private lawsuit by a third-party claimant.

What it does provide is a standard and a forum. A complaint filed with the Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking creates a documented record of the carrier’s conduct, which occasionally changes the posture of a negotiation that has stopped moving. Carriers assign files by value and complexity, so how insurers handle injury cases depends considerably on which desk a claim reaches and how much settlement authority that adjuster holds.

Coverage Questions That Change the Analysis

Policy limits cap what any negotiation can produce. Where the at-fault driver carries minimum coverage and the injuries exceed it, attention moves to other policies and to your own uninsured or underinsured coverage. Disputes over what a policy actually covers are a distinct problem addressed by a DC insurance coverage attorney rather than through the injury claim itself. Minimum coverage requirements also differ by jurisdiction, and Virginia auto insurance rules set different floors than the District does.

Negotiating From a Complete File

A demand submitted before treatment concludes invites a low response, because the adjuster is evaluating an incomplete record. A demand submitted after the medical picture is settled, supported by records that document limitation rather than diagnosis alone, is evaluated differently. The record has to separate economic and non-economic damages clearly, because an adjuster pays documented losses more readily than losses described in general terms. Waiting for that record to be complete is also the single largest factor in how long a case takes.

Claims arising from a fall on commercial property follow the same pattern with an additional obstacle, since the carrier will contest notice of the hazard before it discusses value at all.

Speak With a Washington, DC Personal Injury Attorney

Wayne R. Cohen has been recognized as a Super Lawyer every year for more than a decade and was identified by Washingtonian Magazine among Washington’s top lawyers. Carriers track which firms try cases and which settle everything, and that record affects what a file is worth before any negotiation begins. If an adjuster has requested a statement or made an offer, contact our attorneys before responding. Fees are contingent, and nothing is owed unless we recover.

Back to Personal Injury Resources →

Personal Injury Attorneys In:

Washington DC | Maryland | Virginia


Why Accident Survivors Trust Cohen & Cohen

Hear From Our Clients

“Cohen & Cohen did a great job at recovering a good amount of money for me after my accident. Siri was super informative & responsive. Overall I had a great experience using this firm & they will be my first call if I am ever in an accident again.”

– Charles M.

John Guy - Personal Injury Client Personal Injury Accident

“I had a very positive experience with Cohen & Cohen and I highly recommend them to anyone who needs their services.”

– John G.

Tractor Trailer vs Car

“I would highly recommend Cohen & Cohen. They were awesome on my case. Cohen & Cohen had my best interest at heart at all times.”

– Morgan L.

maria m personal injury accident Maryland Personal Injury Accident

“My experience at Cohen & Cohen has been great from the beginning until the very end when my case was closed…I would definitely recommend them to family, friends or anyone that has a case with a personal injury accident.”

– Maria M.

Reviews

From Our Valued Clients

Cohen & Cohen has an impeccable client satisfaction rating with hundreds of 5-star reviews. We are among the best-rated firms in D.C., Virginia, and Maryland.

Best Personal Injury Lawyer in DC

Cohen & Cohen Has Been Featured On

Cohen & Cohen

Free Case Evaluation